Archive for the ‘American Character’ Category

Today’s Surprise: I Recommend My Own Books

Tuesday, June 22nd, 2010

In the nearly two years that I’ve written this daily blog, I’ve never, to the best of my recollection (how’s that for a lawyerly term that gets me off the hook if I’m wrong?), advertised for books I’ve authored. Today, though, I would beg your indulgence, since I’ve just had a new edition of one of my books come off the presses.

I first wrote If the Foundations Are Destroyed in 1994. This is now the fourth edition of it, complete with a new cover. Why might you want it? The subtitle, Biblical Principles and Civil Government, tells you what it’s all about. I go through what I consider to be Biblical principles and how they apply to government. These form the basis of all my analyses of current government policies. So if you are a regular reader of this blog, this book will provide a window into why I believe as I do.

I have excerpted some of these concepts on the blog already as an overview. If you are interested in a preview, just click on the “Biblical Principles” category in the right sidebar. To learn more about the book and to order it, go to:

 http://snyders.ws/alan/writing/itfad.htm.

While I’m at it, let me talk briefly about the other two books I’ve written.

I did my doctoral dissertation on Noah Webster. While writing it, I had in mind that I wanted to make it into a publishable book. That’s not always easy with a doctoral dissertation, but I made every effort to ensure the writing style was accessible to a general audience as well as scholars. I hope I succeeded.

Webster was the schoolmaster to early America. His speller and dictionary could be found in nearly all American homes. The subtitle, A Spiritual Biography, lets you know that my goal in this book was to chart the course of Webster’s thinking and worldview. At age 50, he experienced a conversion to orthodox Christian faith. How did that affect his scholarly work? The book compares the pre-conversion Webster with the post-conversion man, while offering along the way an accounting of his contributions to American life and culture. To find out more and order this book go to:

http://snyders.ws/alan/writing/webster.htm.

In 2001, I completed a study of the Clinton impeachment. My approach was different than any of the other books on the impeachment written at that time. I wrote it from the perspective of the thirteen congressmen—they were called House Managers—who went to the Senate to argue for Clinton’s removal from office. I personally interviewed all thirteen of the Managers in their Capitol Hill offices; this book provides their story on why they thought it was essential to go forward with these impeachment proceedings in spite of public opposition. It’s a study in character and the significance of the rule of law in society.

At the time of its publication, it was a main selection for the Conservative Book Club. Well-known author and editor of World magazine, Marvin Olasky, wrote the foreword for me. This is the only one of my books that is currently out of print (which I hope can be changed someday), but it is still available for those who are interested. For one of the limited number of new copies that still exist, you can order from this page:

http://snyders.ws/alan/writing/misimp.htm

If you don’t mind getting a used copy, check out Amazon.

I don’t offer these with any expectation of becoming fabulously wealthy. My primary concern is to disseminate valuable information. I’ve promoted books by a number of authors over the past two years. I just wanted to make sure you are aware of mine as well. I hope some of you decide to add one or more of these to your library.

Principles & Character

Tuesday, February 9th, 2010

Last night, I spoke to a group of Christian educators from all over the state of Florida, meeting in Orlando. The subject was the role of principles and character in American political history.

My goal was to show when Christian character and Biblical principles came to the forefront of public policy and when they were ignored. Blessings flowed from the first; consequences from the latter.

It was a survey from the time of Woodrow Wilson, who championed the false idea of the “living Constitution,” to the present day. Along the way, we looked at the negative—Wilson, Hoover, FDR, LBJ, Nixon, Carter, and Clinton—the mixed bags—primarily the two Bushes—and a few genuine heroes of character and principles.

In my view, the two most prominent examples in the twentieth century of how a president should govern are Calvin Coolidge and Ronald Reagan. Coolidge understood the importance of the rule of law, and he declined to run again for the presidency primarily because he feared what would happen to his character if he stayed in that position too long. While liberal historians love to ridicule Coolidge, I believe he deserves our respect.

Reagan, as readers of this blog presumably already know, is a personal favorite of mine. He came to the office with a settled philosophy: the rule of law is essential to keep the government under control; people need economic freedom; civil government isn’t the answer to all our problems, but religious faith, family, and voluntarism are the keys to a healthy society; and national security has to be strong to protect against those who wish us harm.

I ended the talk with a quote from Reagan in a speech that he delivered in that same city, Orlando, back in 1983. The media refers to it as the “Evil Empire” speech, in which he gave that title to the Soviet Union. Reagan closed that speech with these words:

While America’s military strength is important . . . I’ve always maintained that the struggle now going on for the world will never be decided by bombs or rockets, by armies or military might. The real crisis we face today is a spiritual one; at root, it is a test of moral will and faith.

He may have said that 27 years ago, but it’s still just as true today. May we take those words seriously.

American Character: John Peter Muhlenberg

Saturday, December 12th, 2009

John Peter Muhlenberg was pastor of a church in Woodstock, Virginia, prior to the American Revolution. His interest in government was evident—he was elected to the House of Burgesses in 1774 and was known as a follower of Patrick Henry.

As events unfolded into 1775, a year that saw the battles of Lexington and Concord and Bunker Hill initiate colonial resistance to British policies, Muhlenberg sensed that as a pastor he had a responsibility to challenge his flock to put their faith into action.

He concluded a sermon in1775 with these words:

There is a time for all things—a time to preach and a time to pray. There is a time to fight, and that time has now come.

He then took off his clerical gown and revealed his militia uniform underneath. Three hundred men joined him as he rode off to join a Virginia regiment. From 1776 to 1783, he served in the Continental Army, making him one of the select few who were part of the army for nearly the entire war. He saw action at Charleston, Brandywine, Stony Point, and at the final battle of Yorktown. He was with Washington during the brutal winter at Valley Forge in 1777-1778.

When his brother complained that he had abandoned the church for the army, Muhlenberg replied,

I am a clergyman, it is true, but I am a member of society as well as the poorest layman, and my liberty is as dear to me as to any man. Shall I then sit still and enjoy myself at home when the best blood of the continent is spilling? . . . Do you think if America should be conquered I should be safe?

Clergymen are citizens as much as anyone else. They have the same rights and liberties, and when those are in danger, God may lead them to take action. That was Muhlenberg’s belief.

After the war, he served as vice president of the Pennsylvania government, then was elected to the first House of Representatives under the nation’s new Constitution, where he held his seat from 1789-1795, and again from 1799-1801. Although elected to the Senate in 1801, he opted instead to take the position as supervisor of U.S. Customs in Pennsylvania. He never went back to the pulpit, but continued to be an active Lutheran layman until his death in 1807.

The statue of Muhlenberg posted above can be found in the United States Capitol. It shows Muhlenberg taking off his clerical robe to reveal his uniform. Each state could choose two individuals to represent the state in the Capitol building. Considering how many influential men from Virginia impacted the foundation of the country, it’s instructive and  fascinating that Virginians chose Muhlenberg to be one of their two representatives. Apparently his inspiring call to service and his dedication to the war for independence made quite an impression.

The Truly Valuable Part of Mankind

Tuesday, September 29th, 2009

I commented on the attitude of the U.N. in yesterday’s posting, particularly how America has been a target of the majority of nations that comprise that body. Today, this political cartoon appeared, making the same point.

The real issue here is why we want those nations to like us in the first place. Most of them are dictatorial thuggeries (is that a word?) rather than legitimate governments. For instance . . .

I was reminded of a statement George Washington made in a letter to a friend in 1797, shortly after leaving the presidency. Washington commented:

Without virtue and without integrity the finest talents or the most brilliant accomplishments can never gain the respect or conciliate the esteem of the truly valuable part of mankind.

There’s a lot in that short statement. First, he points to virtue and integrity as the hallmarks of a man’s character. It doesn’t matter what natural talents a person may possess or what external accomplishments he might have attained if he doesn’t first have virtue and integrity.

Talents and accomplishments by themselves mean little without the character necessary to undergird them. And without that type of character, he says no one will gain the esteem of what he calls “the truly valuable part of mankind.”

We want to gain the respect of those who are respectable themselves, who have exhibited God’s character in their lives and whose accomplishments are based on virtue and integrity. Why would we want to ingratiate ourselves with those who are unworthy of our esteem? Yet that seems to be what we are doing. Right now, the United States appears to have closer ties with the Fidel Castros, Hugo Chavezes, and Ahmadinejads of the world than with those who are genuine allies.

This is due to the man at the top. The type of leadership he exhibits reflects what Washington warned of: someone who has innate talents and certain outward successes, yet is devoid of real virtue and integrity. Keep praying for our country.

American Character: John Jay

Tuesday, September 22nd, 2009

He was a significant founder, yet not many people know his name. He was a devoted Christian, but how many are aware of that?

John Jay’s family came to America as persecuted Protestants from France. Liberty of conscience came with them, and that belief was transferred to him.

Jay was deeply involved in the constitutional debate over Great Britain’s policies leading to the American Revolution. While he was very concerned over the British government’s claims, he nevertheless was a moderate in his approach, seeking a way to heal the breach. When that was no longer possible, he gave himself fully to the war for independence.

Throughout the war, he served diligently—first Chief Justice of the New York Supreme Court; president of the Continental Congress; minister to Spain. He was in France as one of the negotiators to reach terms for ending the war. When he returned to America, he became Secretary of Foreign Affairs in the Confederation government.

When New York was debating the ratification of the proposed Constitution, Jay employed his pen as one of the authors of the famous Federalist Papers. His contributions were not as numerous as Madison’s and Hamilton’s, but his activity at that time was curtailed by illness.

George Washington nominated Jay, and the Senate confirmed him, as the first Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court. Washington’s concern over relations with Britain led him to ask Jay to go to that country to negotiate a new treaty of commerce. At the time, he was still the sitting Chief Justice, an arrangement that never would happen now, but Washington chose to do this simply because Jay was his most experienced diplomat, and the one he trusted most to deal with Britain.

In the 1790s, the Supreme Court wasn’t as powerful as it has become over time, so Jay voluntarily stepped down from his position as Chief Justice to become Governor of New York. During his tenure, the legislature passed a law leading to the eventual elimination of slavery in that state—a goal Jay had labored for over many years.

After his governorship, Jay retired from active political life, but he didn’t retire from life itself. A sincere Christian, he later served as President of the American Bible Society. In a letter to a friend late in life, Jay commented:

Providence has given to our people the choice of their rulers, and it is the duty, as well as the privilege and interest of our Christian nation to select and prefer Christians for their rulers.

Try saying something like that today and see what happens.

John Jay—another one of our largely forgotten founders, but one who deserves greater attention.

American Character: John Witherspoon

Monday, August 24th, 2009

He was the man who shaped the men who shaped America, yet few know anything about him.

John Witherspoon arrived in America in 1768, enticed to leave his Scottish homeland by the offer of the presidency of a fairly new college called the College of New Jersey. Later, its name would change to Princeton.

Witherspoon was a clergyman before he was an educator, but the two were always intertwined in his life. He took the fledging college, which started shortly after the First Great Awakening, and made it into a stable institution. He also taught his students that God, not government, was the one who gave men rights. One father in Virginia, wanting that perspective taught to his son, sent him to study under Witherspoon rather than to the College of William and Mary, where all Virginia gentlemen were expected to go. That son’s name was James Madison, who later became known as the Father of the Constitution.

When problems developed between the colonies and Great Britain’s government, Witherspoon sided with the colonial cause. He was the only clergyman to sign the Declaration of Independence. Throughout the long revolutionary war, he continued as a delegate to the Continental Congress, serving on over 100 committees. He lost a son in the Battle of Germantown. His devotion to the cause was total.

After the war ended, he gave a sermon entitled The Dominion of Providence over the Passions of Men, in which he argued that the American Revolution was the hand of God in the affairs of men, and that God aided the American cause because He wanted to raise up this nation as His own.

Witherspoon commented,

It is in the man of piety and inward principle that we may expect to find the uncorrupted patriot, the useful citizen, and the invincible soldier. God grant that in America true religion and civil liberty may be inseparable and that the unjust attempts to destroy the one, may in the issue tend to the support and establishment of both.

In other words, there is no viable separation between the Christian faith and civil liberty; the two go hand in hand. If you destroy either one, the other will be destroyed as well in the process.

During his tenure at Princeton, Witherspoon’s students not only filled pulpits, but they got involved in government also. A list of those who served is impressive: 13 governors; 3 United States Supreme Court justices; 20 senators; 33 congressmen; 1 vice president; and 1 president [James Madison].

John Witherspoon: the man who shaped the men who shaped America.

American Character: Samuel Adams

Tuesday, August 18th, 2009

If Patrick Henry was the voice of American resistance to the policies of Great Britain, Samuel Adams was the organizer.

His contributions to American independence are immense. Far ahead of his contemporaries, he believed that independence was inevitable. When others thought everything between the colonies and the Mother Country had been ironed out, Adams understood that the truces were essentially temporary peace arrangements. The problem, he knew, was that both operated from differing principles. To keep his fellow citizens informed on those principles, he started the Committees of Correspondence.

Samuel Adams’s convictions and actions were the result of his Christian faith. Energized by George Whitefield in the First Great Awakening, he became the premier defender of American rights. His Rights of the Colonists included a section called “As Christians.”

The book above, which is a fairly new biography of Adams, is the best I’ve ever read at showing how his Christianity formed the foundation for all his actions. I heartily recommend it.

Adams was present at the creation: he was a signer of the Declaration of Independence. Upon his return to Philadelphia in August 1776 to sign the document, he gave a speech that is actually as much a sermon as a speech. In this American independence speech, Adams noted,

We have this day restored the Sovereign to whom alone men ought to be obedient. He reigns in Heaven, and with a propitious eye beholds his subjects assuming that freedom of thought and dignity of self-direction which He bestowed on them. From the rising to the setting sun, may His kingdom come.

Some historians have referred to Adams as the last Puritan. I would instead view him as a key transmitter of the Biblical tradition, which eventually transformed into an evangelicalism that dominated American society in the first half of the nineteenth century.

While we may respectfully discuss some of Adams’s tactics in his endeavor to foster American independence, none can reasonably deny the faith that inspired his actions. He deserves respect as one of the seminal Founding Fathers.

American Character: Patrick Henry

Monday, August 17th, 2009

Nearly everyone knows the name Patrick Henry. But we are a nation of people only barely acquainted with our Founders. There is little depth to that knowledge.

Henry was a man who was motivated by his Christian faith, something some historians try to deny. As a young boy, he was taken to the revival meetings of the First Great Awakening by his mother. It was at these meetings that he learned his method of public speaking, an approach that made him the most eloquent voice of resistance to the aims of the British government.

Attendance at those meetings also helped him see how the official church of Virginia, the Church of England, was treating dissenters. Baptists were often put in jail for not getting permission from the government to preach. Henry took the side of the Baptists, saying they should have the liberty to speak without government interference.

In his first year as a member of Virginia’s House of Burgesses, Henry authored resolutions against the Stamp Act that called this act an imposition of taxes that violated the British constitution. Those resolutions passed the House and put Virginia in the forefront of the resistance. Henry said this about the passage of his resolutions:

Whether this will prove a blessing or a curse will depend upon the use our people make of the blessings which a gracious God hath bestowed on us. If they are wise, they will be great and happy. If they are of a contrary character, they will be miserable. Righteousness alone can exalt a nation. Reader! Whoever thou art, remember this; and in thy sphere, practise virtue thyself, and encourage it in others.

His most famous speech, of course, was the one he made in March 1775, to convince the Virginia House to prepare for the eventual clash of arms. We usually refer to it as the “Give me liberty or give me death” speech. But all too few of us have read it; therefore, we don’t know that it is filled with Biblical allusions. He says he is speaking out because it would be an act of disloyalty to God if he didn’t. He talks about being betrayed with a kiss, and how that can prove a snare to the nation. He says there is a just God who presides over the destinies of nations, and he is trusting in Him to guide the resistance.

Finally, in his will, Henry states, after he has disposed of all his property:

This is all the inheritance I give to my dear family. The religion of Christ will give them one which will make them rich indeed.

That’s the Patrick Henry too few people know. This posting, though, has just added to the number of those who know him better.

Pride Goes Before . . . What Was That Again?

Friday, August 14th, 2009

I’m grateful for the example of Calvin Coolidge. Yes, you read that correctly. A man who is ridiculed by all the “right” people actually was one of the most faithful to the Constitution. And he also realized the danger of holding political power. He declined to run again for the presidency in 1928. His reason? Read this carefully and appreciate what he is saying:

It is difficult for men in high office to avoid the malady of self-delusion. They are always surrounded by worshipers. They are constantly, and for the most part sincerely, assured of their greatness. They live in an artificial atmosphere of adulation and exaltation which sooner or later impairs their judgment. They are in grave danger of becoming careless and arrogant.

Thank you, President Coolidge, for that warning. There are a lot of people in power today who could benefit from your wisdom.

For instance, what about the attempt by the Congress to buy a fleet of jets for their leaders’ personal use? Why, it was only a mere $550 million—what’s the problem? Do we want them to fly commercial airliners like everyone else? That would reduce them to our level, which is absurd, is it not? Why shouldn’t taxpayers pay for their comfort?

Fortunately, there was enough uproar over that one that it crashed and burned.

What about a president who directly contradicts himself, even though videos prove he did say something previously? How does he think he can get away with such an obvious ploy?

The only way this type of hubris can be adequately explained is to resort once again to Coolidge’s words. He actually thinks he can get away with it because he lives in a bubble where everyone assures him of his greatness, and where he will not be held accountable for blatant lies.

I have commented previously that I believe Obama is one of the most arrogant, prideful men who has ever held the presidency. The attitude I perceive is something like this:

Now, some people may criticize my criticism by quoting Scripture: judge not that you be not judged. I take that warning seriously. When you point your finger at someone, you must be careful. But that Scripture, in context, says that the judging is wrong only if you are committing the same sin. That’s when you first concentrate on taking the log out of your own eye.

It’s not a joyful thing for me to talk about the president in this manner. I wish he could inspire confidence, but nearly everything he does is contrary to the Biblical principles I believe in ardently. And he does act as if he knows everything. That’s dangerous for him as well as for the nation, simply because pride goes before a fall. I don’t want this nation to fall. Let’s truly pray that arrogance and pride disappear from the councils of our government, and that reliance on the wisdom of the Lord will replace them.

American Character: Noah Webster

Monday, July 27th, 2009

Webster: Father of Early American Education

The name “Webster” sounds familiar to most people. They think for a minute and then say, “Oh, yeah, he’s the dictionary guy, right?” Right.

But he’s more than that. Noah Webster is a prime example of someone who exhibits the character trait of diligence. A native of Connecticut  and descendant of Pilgrim governor William Bradford, Webster was raised in the Congregational church, graduated from Yale, and even was awarded a master’s degree—unusual for the time.

In 1783, he got the nation’s attention with his first book, which is now called Webster’s Blue-Back Speller. It sold millions over the next century. It went with the pioneers westward, along with the Bible, teaching new generations how to read and spell. It was Webster who created an American spelling that broke from the English tradition: music instead of musick; color rather than colour.

Webster’s Speller, along with other educational books throughout his life, earned him the title “Father of Early American Education.” His crowning achievement, though, was his monumental 1828 dictionary, the first full-fledged dictionary to be published in America. It was a production that he worked on single-handedly for approximately 20 years. When it was completed, it quickly became the standard for America.

More than that, however, Webster’s dictionary revealed his Christian faith. Although raised in the church, Christianity, for him, had been primarily an external ritual. But at age 50, during a revival in New Haven, he submitted his life to God. This conversion experience gave a new impetus to all his work from that point on. The dictionary is more than a listing of word definitions. It’s actually pretty fascinating to look at it today because many of the definitions use Scripture verses as examples of how the words should be understood, and some of the definitions include commentaries from the author that provide a Christian context. Such a thing would be unimaginable now.

Webster’s memory has been eclipsed in educational circles by the likes of Horace Mann and John Dewey, both of whom departed from the Christian worldview. This neglect needs to be rectified. That’s one reason why I made Webster the subject of my doctoral dissertation. It was eventually published as Defining Noah Webster: A Spiritual Biography. If you’re interested, you can purchase it on Amazon.com. Information about the book can be found here.

Let’s not forget America’s early Christian leaders.